
First, let's start with some inspiring quotes...
Julie Bogart's Bravewriter blog is one of many sources that has helped me keep homeschooling in perspective. Jody recently redirected to me to a set of posts from 2007 on Julie's "One thing" concept. They've been such a help that I'd like to elaborate a little on how some quotes from the series apply to our family's learning. I'd come to these conclusions independently before I read the series, but it always gives me a nice feeling of confirmation when someone so articulately states something I was working out by experience.
The first quote is about how deep interests led to well-rounded learning in Julie's home:
"By allowing my kids to wallow in Greek mythology for two years, they discovered a way into history that helped them imagine other times and places...'One thing' implies trusting that the immersion in one topic that really interests will lead to all the learning necessary."
The second is a set of three short pointers about writing:
"We start with the writer, not writing forms or skills...Fluency comes before competence...Direct experience adds depth and insight to writing..."
And the third quote is about the academic stress that creeps up on homeschooling parents in junior high. I've been thinking a lot about that this year, as the rubber meets the road:
"Cozy learning...is that wonderful intersection of real studies combined with natural lifstyle...By junior high, the coziness starts to disappear...This odd notion called, 'now it really counts' moves in and takes the learner hostage...panic and doubt ensue.[The moms of junior high students] take a look at the college admissions list, remember their own high school days and immediately lost all the love of learning they've cultivated for the last eight years."
After this third quote, Julie described how she dealt with anxiety creep in her own family. I thought Julie's story was particularly interesting because she jettisoned a program that would probably have been the envy of many academically-oriented homeschooling parents. Why? Because her teens were unhappy while carrying it out.
Since I started writing this post (I've actually tried and ditched several attempts over that past two weeks), I've discovered that Julie has added a new "One Thing" post entitled, "How do you fit it all in, one thing at a time?" This new one is well worth reading, too, because it explains that "One thing" at a time is how adults learn naturally. She describes the exhaustion that can result from years of school.
"The freedom to think and do and be what you want are intoxicating and produce the best conditions for learning. You find yourself motivated by your own hunger, not by someone controlling what you do. And in fact, there is brain research that supports your adult style of learning. Apparently our brains do best when we have the opportunity to focus intently, allowing the greatest interconnection of ideas to occur simultaneously...and sequentially."
And now, let's move to the application...
C.Z. has been writing a short story lately. I really hope she keeps at it, because it's one of the longest and most ambitious pieces of writing she's ever attempted. It's a sort of dystopian comedy about an enormous school, set in the latter part of this century. The descriptive details seem natural even though the subject is conjectural, and the story is quirky in a particularly C.Z sort of way.
Yesterday she got to a point where she realized that in order to describe the school accurately, she had to work out plausible details about its size, shape, and design. She started sketching, quickly ran into some design problems she had to work out, and started doing some research.
Before the hour was out, she was making calculations based on the number of students currently enrolled in U.S. high schools, recommended square footage per student, typical library sizes and number of volumes (because she doesn't like Kindle and thinks it won't succeed), cafeteria sizes, plausible numbers of floors, typical high-rise building infrastructure, and logistical problems that might be presented by such a large building. She even found an architectural model for the type of building she was trying to design (partly Hartsfield Airport, but also a hotel that I remembered from childhood because it fit her description so well). The result of all this research was a set of ridiculously large numbers, but they were consciously ridiculous in a way that bolstered the point of the story. When you read the result, the casual way she mentions the large numbers involved in the building makes the story funnier.
In the process of figuring out this building, C.Z. started doing square footage calculations based on typical room sizes, subtracting out the outer classrooms from the inner ones the way one subtracts a frame from the area of a picture. There were conversions from miles (!) to feet, sometimes in three dimensions. At one point, she made a calculation error, but didn't realize it for quite some time, by which point it had affected several other calculations. In the end, she fixed the problem by changing the building's trolley system to a moving sidewalk.
This one example illustrates many things that Julie was talking about in her "One thing" series:
C.Z. focused intently, allowing for interconnections to form between new information and things she'd previously learned, powered by her own hunger. One topic, pursued intently, led to any number of other topics.
Also, this kind of writing is very much about starting with the writer. Though it might not seem like C.Z. is writing about something she knows (school), she actually is, because this has been a whole year of learning about school, from involvement in her music program to watching most of her homeschooled friends apply to high school (you apply to public school here). And as with many things C.Z. does, there is a lighthearted undercurrent of social protest throughout the story.
In fact, and lastly, this year has at times seemed like one huge assault on what Julie calls the "coziness factor." Not only does school touch our lives increasingly through our social networks, but I realized yesterday that I was evaluating no fewer than fourteen outside classes for next year's homeschool. At that rate, there wouldn't be any home left! Obviously, we'll say no to many of these, but it illustrates the insidiousness of high school anxiety and academic creep. In light of all these temptations, I admire C.Z.'s consistent adherence to the spirit of independent learning.
Natural learning for older students doesn't really have to be different in kind from natural learning for younger students. The learning is more in depth, of course, because older students have more mature minds, and more experience. They're making connections and they can come up with insights that will sometimes surprise you. But it doesn't necessarily have to involve slavish adherence to textbooks, externally imposed "rigor" to make sure the student does high school level work, or sophisticated organizational tools that keep all your teen's classes straight.
If the atmosphere in your home all along has made love of learning a priority, I'm convinced that there's no need to panic in the eighth grade. Each family looks different, of course. But I am convinced that deep and natural interest has a way of creating learning that is as "rigorous" as any high school.* And often it comes about because you have the luxury of doing one thing for a while.
***
*End note: Another way I've seen the advantages of deep learning illustrated lately is via the NYCHEA ROV team. They're a local homeschooled robotics team who won an international competition last year. They beat out institutional high school teams who had much higher budgets and professional mentors.
After listening to one of the team members talk about the competition last week, I asked whether perhaps the team's low budget may have made them rely more on ingenuity, and whether the judges may have liked that. He said that it definitely had been a factor. Some of the other teams had more expensive and sophisticated robots, but since the NYCHEA team didn't have these advantages, they had to do more to build their own understanding, and this led to a better robot.
I might add, of course, that I framed the question that way on a hunch that it might be the case. The young man was very gracious, and even pointed out that every competition is a close one!